Having listened to the audio of the case - a case which the org has allegedly brought on the grounds of copyright infringement - why didn't D.S.'s legal team request that the org's case be thrown out, based on the following two points?
1) In the first instance, D.S. was legally covered by "fair use" legislation, therefore, there were no grounds for copyright claims.
2) crucially - in the second instance, (at 4:25 secs) the judge stated that DS committed NO copyright infringement, it was simply a confidential document, not a copyrighted one.
Maybe someone can explain if there's something I'm missing here, but if I was a juror in a case like this, I would say the court action was specious & malicious.